🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.